Pilots and engineers affirm that it is aerodynamically impossible for a plane the size of a Boeing to have made the necessary degree turn into the Pentagon while maintaining flight speed and a distance of less than 20 feet from the ground before crashing into the building. A drone is a plausible explanation for the precision with which the plane hit the Pentagon, the lack of wreckage found at the site, and the smaller hole made in the Pentagon wall. The magnitude of this failure undermines the defense department to its core, yet this astonishing breach is all but ignored by the media cartel.
NORAD failed to intercept the planes after it was notified of the hijackings. Air controllers along the flight paths of all four planes reported the hijackings, requesting military response to no avail. There was mass confusion about where planes were and weren't, evidenced by the recorded tapes of numerous air-control calls and conversations that day. Interestingly, Rumsfeld was photographed carrying debris from the crash site at the Pentagon later that day.
No bodies or wreckage were found at the Pennsylvania crash site, just a barren hole in the ground. Yet a driver's license belonging to a flight attendant and a passport belonging to a hijacker were found near the site.
The official story is that the plane disintegrated with all its occupants. The cell-phone calls claimed to have been made from Flight 93 at 30, feet in the air prior to the crash were not possible because in , the technology for such calls was not available. A third building collapsed around 5 p. Seven World Trade Center, previously known as the Solomon Brothers Building but now more commonly referred to as WTC7, collapsed in exactly the same manner as the towers - straight-down free-fall as in a planned demolition.
But no plane crashed into it. No skyscraper made of steel had ever collapsed due to fire before the World Trade Center towers. Nor has any steel building been destroyed by fire since. Yet less than 30 minutes after the towers' collapse, the media cartel reported that the fire fed by the jet fuel "brought the buildings down.
You know what CGI is? You know what deep fake videos are? It wasn't hit by a dadgum thing," he said. Wood went on to claim that the Pentagon "got hit by a missile," not a plane.
We got played. We got played by people who are so evil that for money they killed 2, Americans on that day—including policemen and firefighters," Wood said. He then called former President George W. Bush "a criminal" and said he should "go to jail. I would hope that those who just make up nonsense would see the error of their ways and have some compassion for those who died in this attack.
Little-Acorn Well-Known Member. The silliest part of posts like this, is not that khothla believes them. The silliest part, is that he thinks anyone besides him will believe them. Joined Aug 26, Messages 1, Click to expand Joined Oct 22, Messages South tower plane was added to this rare wide angle clip This is so simple it's stupid. The plane does not pass through the open skyline before it comes into view which proves a fake plane was added.
Joined Jan 22, Messages I took the work from September Clues and made it into something real instead of a rambling mess. Dick Oliver called the orb a remote controlled drone. He was on the ground and saw it floating just like it did in 4 live broadcasts. Dick was totally oblivious that his honest account completely destroyed the myth of a real plane impacting T2. Mark, cryptically laughs at the end of his description , further proving that he was describing the slow moving drone, and falling short of confirming that it really wasn't a plane.
It's no different than Jean Hill saying she saw the secret service shooting back, but falling short of fingering the driver. Of course it didn't belong in the area because it was a drone and not the boeing it was supposed to be.
He explained to FOX News that the plane had no windows, a blue logo, and did not look like a commercial plane. Mark witnessed this Mark were you close enough to see any markings on the airplane? Yeah there was definitely a blue, circular logo on the front of the plane towards the front. It definitely did not look like a commercial plane. I did not see any windows on the side.
It was definitely very low You said you did not see any windows on the side? I saw the plane was flying low. I was probably a block away from the sub-way in Brooklyn and that plane came down very low, and again it was not a normal flight that I have ever seen at an airport. It was a plane with a blue logo on the front and it just looked like it did not belong in this area. He should have a 1 and 4 at the top, but it's self-explanatory.
Rich's post is below the picture. Robert Clark is credited with this and one other fake photo image from Rich didn't line up the fake right engine with its way out of alignment left counterpart. Greeley is an expert at analyzing images to determine the shape and features of geological formations based on shadow and light effects.
After studying the high-resolution image and comparing it to photos of a Boeing ER's undercarriage, Greeley dismissed the notion that the Howard photo reveals a "pod. In fact, the photo reveals only the Boeing's right fairing, a pronounced bulge that contains the landing gear.
He concludes that sunlight glinting off the fairing gave it an exaggerated look. Culick, professor of aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology, gave a blunter response: "That's bull. They're really stretching. Elsis of StandDown. None of the fighters got anywhere near the pirated planes. Why couldn't ATC find the hijacked flights? When the hijackers turned off the planes' transponders, which broadcast identifying signals, ATC had to search 4, identical radar blips crisscrossing some of the country's busiest air corridors.
0コメント